Message boards : Number crunching : Report Maximum CPU Time Exceeded WU HERE
Author | Message |
---|---|
dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1831 Credit: 119,526,853 RAC: 5,737 |
Just had one. What info do you want? Host Project Date Message dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 14:16:20 Throughput 6124 bytes/sec dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 14:16:20 Finished upload of NO_SIM_ANNEAL_2tif_228_635_2_0 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 14:16:11 Started upload of NO_SIM_ANNEAL_2tif_228_635_2_0 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 14:16:09 Starting result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1vls__250_2364_0 using rosetta version 481 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 14:16:08 Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_2tif_228_635_2 finished dbserver DBSERVER --- 26/01/2006 14:16:08 request_reschedule_cpus: process exited dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 11:53:37 Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_2tif_228_635_2 using rosetta version 481 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 11:53:37 Computation for result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_2vik__250_1426_0 finished dbserver DBSERVER --- 26/01/2006 11:53:37 request_reschedule_cpus: process exited dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 11:53:36 Unrecoverable error for result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_2vik__250_1426_0 (Maximum CPU time exceeded) dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 26/01/2006 11:53:36 Aborting result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_2vik__250_1426_0: exceeded CPU time limit 61808.106462 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 25/01/2006 16:54:50 Throughput 5380 bytes/sec dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 25/01/2006 16:54:50 Finished upload of PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1vls__250_1175_0_0 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 25/01/2006 16:54:19 Started upload of PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1vls__250_1175_0_0 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 25/01/2006 16:54:17 Starting result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_2vik__250_1426_0 using rosetta version 481 dbserver DBSERVER rosetta@home 25/01/2006 16:54:16 Computation for result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1vls__250_1175_0 finished Duron 1600, 512MB RAM, XP Pro (fully patched) Benchmarks were: Host Project Date Message dbserver DBSERVER --- 24/01/2006 18:12:09 2404 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU dbserver DBSERVER --- 24/01/2006 18:12:09 1456 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Please report "Maximum Time exceeded" errors here, by providing the following information; The Work Unit name The result Id of the WU - Can be found on the user statistics page The CPU time spent on the Work Unit - This is also on the user statics page Percent complete (if known) at the time the failure - Shown in the BOINC Manager window on your system Your system ID - also available on the user statistics page To save some typing time, you can post a link to the work unit result. The form of the command is as follows; [url]WEB PAGE ADDRESS GOES HERE[/url] How to locate the information we need - With thanks to user "DCDC" for asking. [quote]I'm not sure how to find the info you're after. I've looked through loads of results listed under the computer that the result came from at: Home > Your Account > Computers > [choose computer] > Results and also through the statistics tab at the top, but all i'm going on is the name of the work unit in question. I've looked through all the results - errored or not - and can't see it. Answer: You probably already know most of what I am about to post here so please do not be insulted at my answer. First are you sure your WU failed as a result of a Maximum time exceeded? In every case it would have to be the longest WU you have ever seen on your machine for CPU time. These errors ALWAYS occur at almost exactly the same number of CPU seconds on a particular machine. The actual number of seconds will be different in most cases for every individual machine. If you have WUs that have run longer than the one that errored and they completed successfully then the errors you are looking at are not "Maximum Time exceeded" errors. In any case, you went to the right place to locate the information we need. It would defiantly be listed as a client error in your stats page for that machine. So you only need to look at the error WUs. If you click on the result link, about 2/3 of the way down the page it should show the type of error. That is where you will find the phrase "Maximum Time Exceeded". It will also show the error in the messages tab on your computer in the BOINC manager. In those messages it will give you the WU name but not the result name. All of this presumes that your system has actually reported the WU back to R@H. You can tell if it has reported by looking in the work tab in the BOINC manager If the WU is not shown there it has reported, if it shows "Ready to Report" in the status column then it has not reported yet. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
Los Alcoholicos~La Muis Send message Joined: 4 Nov 05 Posts: 34 Credit: 1,041,724 RAC: 0 |
The score of the "Maximum cpu time exeeded" error: Dual G5 2GHz 97986 - MAX CPU time +/- 12:30 MORE_FRAGS_1ogw_222_7591_0 no id (already removed from the host result page) INCREASE_CYCLES_10_1ogw_226_6353_1 no id (already removed from the host result page) MORE_FRAGS_1ogw_222_7024_1 no id (already removed from the host result page) INCREASE_CYCLES_10_logw_226_9437_0 6243867 MORE_FRAGS_W_BARCODE_logw_231_6958_0 6243401 DEFAULT_logw_220_2312_1 5106086 Powerbook G4 1.25GHz 60954 MAX CPU time +/- 14:30 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1dhn__250_1858_2 8021660 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1c9oA__250_1041_2 8021240 INCREASE_CYCLES_10_1di2_226_7035_1 no id (already removed from the host result page) MAX CPU time +/- 40:30 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1wit__250_514_0 7064862 G4 2GHz 100382 MAX CPU time +/- 26:00 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1c9oA__250_1041_2 7088268 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1c9oA__250_1041_2 7074002 INCREASE_CYCLES_10_1di2_226_6975_0 no id (already removed from the host result page) G4 1.8GHz 101675 MAX CPU time +/- 22:30 BARCODE_FRAG_30_1hz6_234_2087_0 6590138 INCREASE_CYCLES_10_1di2_226_6975_0 no id (already removed from the host result page) AMD XP 2,6 GHz 57518 MAX CPU time +/- 10:40 BARCODE_FRAG_30_2reb_234_9869_0 no id (already removed from the host result page) |
KwintenB Send message Joined: 24 Nov 05 Posts: 6 Credit: 183,329 RAC: 0 |
I already posted on the message board, but now i see it has al special place for max cpu time I crunched 8 hours on that WU, everythings seems normal when i upload the WU but on the site i see it give a computation error. Will i get credits for this job. Or are thes 200 thrown-away points? PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1fkb__250_348 |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Please report "Maximum Time exceeded" errors here, by providing the following information; The Work Unit name The result Id of the WU - Can be found on the user statistics page The CPU time spent on the Work Unit - This is also on the user statics page Percent complete (if known) at the time the failure - Shown in the BOINC Manager window on your system Your system ID - also available on the user statistics page To save some typing time, you can post a link to the work unit result. The form of the command is as follows; [url]WEB PAGE ADDRESS GOES HERE[/url] How to locate the information we need - With thanks to user "DCDC" for asking. [quote]I'm not sure how to find the info you're after. I've looked through loads of results listed under the computer that the result came from at: Home > Your Account > Computers > [choose computer] > Results and also through the statistics tab at the top, but all i'm going on is the name of the work unit in question. I've looked through all the results - errored or not - and can't see it. Answer: You probably already know most of what I am about to post here so please do not be insulted at my answer. First are you sure your WU failed as a result of a Maximum time exceeded? In every case it would have to be the longest WU you have ever seen on your machine for CPU time. These errors ALWAYS occur at almost exactly the same number of CPU seconds on a particular machine. The actual number of seconds will be different in most cases for every individual machine. If you have WUs that have run longer than the one that errored and they completed successfully then the errors you are looking at are not "Maximum Time exceeded" errors. In any case, you went to the right place to locate the information we need. It would defiantly be listed as a client error in your stats page for that machine. So you only need to look at the error WUs. If you click on the result link, about 2/3 of the way down the page it should show the type of error. That is where you will find the phrase "Maximum Time Exceeded". It will also show the error in the messages tab on your computer in the BOINC manager. In those messages it will give you the WU name but not the result name. All of this presumes that your system has actually reported the WU back to R@H. You can tell if it has reported by looking in the work tab in the BOINC manager If the WU is not shown there it has reported, if it shows "Ready to Report" in the status column then it has not reported yet. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact |
Richard M Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 13 Credit: 320,417 RAC: 0 |
Host #1425 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__250_2244_1 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1louA_250_2173_1 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1wit__250_2412_0 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1louA_250_1564_1 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1tig__250_1678_0 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1tit__250_104_0 BARCODE_FRAG_30_1ogw_234_6621_0 INCREASE_CYCLES_10_1dcj_226_641_0 Host #60587 NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_2reb_251_4324_0 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_2chf__250_2249_0 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_2vik__250_1693_0 PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1ten__250_1864_1 Percent complete unknown. TTYL Richard Click the Sig! BOINC Wiki |
scsimodo Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 93 Credit: 946,359 RAC: 0 |
Just found two of them https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=7169108 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=7328860 Percent complete unknown. |
Dave Wilson Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 35 Credit: 379,049 RAC: 0 |
Here are mine, All are from the only machine I have running Rosetta and it is a Powerbook (Lumbard) with a G4 500 upgrade card, https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=4928068 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=4928067 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=4928030 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=4928007 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=4928006 As you can see all times are within 1 sec. of each other. 6182438 - 4928068 - 8 Jan 2006 19:50:28 UTC 25 Jan 2006 19:10:41 UTC Over Client error Computing 72,088.09 - 140.56 6182437 - 4928067 - 8 Jan 2006 19:50:28 UTC 22 Jan 2006 23:15:01 UTC Over Client error Computing 72,087.20 - 140.56 6182399 - 4928030 - 8 Jan 2006 19:50:28 UTC 21 Jan 2006 05:38:12 UTC Over Client error Computing 72,087.83 - 140.56 6182376 - 4928007 - 8 Jan 2006 19:50:28 UTC 24 Jan 2006 22:46:18 UTC Over Client error Computing 72,087.35 - 140.56 6182375 - 4928006 - 8 Jan 2006 19:50:28 UTC 23 Jan 2006 20:34:42 UTC Over Client error Computing 72,087.19 - 140.56 |
[DPC] Frederik Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 154,433 RAC: 0 |
had one running for 10 hours, 1%: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=6843024 and onother one that I ended trough the gui, was running 6 hours and still 1%: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=6856048 |
Los Alcoholicos~Megaflix Send message Joined: 10 Nov 05 Posts: 24 Credit: 77,199 RAC: 0 |
7257012 5796373 20 Jan 2006 10:48:10 UTC 26 Jan 2006 16:19:23 UTC Over Client error Done 45,491.09 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=5796373 |
dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1831 Credit: 119,526,853 RAC: 5,737 |
OK, re my original post I've added the info requested ;) - you can remove my original post if it helps the housekeeping? PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_2vik__250_1426_0 Computer ID: 52945 CPU Time: 61809.367506 % Complete unknown HTH Danny |
Cureseekers~VortoN Send message Joined: 11 Nov 05 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,396,786 RAC: 0 |
Ok, some problems with PRODUCTION_ABINITIO WU's The first couple: Work unit name - PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1rnbA_250_1194 The result Id - 7137340 The CPU time spent on the Work Unit - 8,979.84 Percent complete - not known Your system ID - 64806 A link to the wu: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=5698305 Work unit name - PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1louA_250_1180 The result Id - 7135590 The CPU time spent on the Work Unit - 27,758.20 Percent complete - not known Your system ID - 64806 A link to the wu: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=5696897 And a lot more to come when the rest of my PC's start flushing... Im in offline mode on all PC. Total over 3000 credits worth of CPU time wasted because of these PRODUCTION_ABANITIO jobs... hope i at least get SOME credit/points for them... |
dcryor Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 158,605 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=83248 work unit 5427416 result ID 6812419 no CPU time shown on user page (!?) it was about 90% complete Error message: 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||Starting BOINC client version 5.2.13 for windows_intelx86 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||libcurl/7.14.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8 zlib/1.2.3 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||Data directory: C:Program FilesBOINC 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 1.80GHz 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||Memory: 511.43 MB physical, 1.93 GB virtual 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||Disk: 27.94 GB total, 20.50 GB free 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM|rosetta@home|Computer ID: 83248; location: home; project prefs: default 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||General prefs: from rosetta@home (last modified 2006-01-23 17:12:57) 1/27/2006 8:24:49 AM||General prefs: no separate prefs for home; using your defaults 1/27/2006 8:24:50 AM||Remote control not allowed; using loopback address 1/27/2006 9:54:19 AM|rosetta@home|Deferring computation for result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__239_1890_0 1/27/2006 9:54:19 AM||Resuming computation and network activity 1/27/2006 9:54:19 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities 1/27/2006 9:54:22 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__239_1890_0 using rosetta version 481 1/27/2006 2:22:53 PM||Suspending computation and network activity - user is active 1/27/2006 2:22:53 PM|rosetta@home|Pausing result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__239_1890_0 (left in memory) 1/27/2006 2:31:49 PM||Resuming computation and network activity 1/27/2006 2:31:49 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities 1/27/2006 2:31:49 PM|rosetta@home|Resuming result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__239_1890_0 using rosetta version 481 1/27/2006 2:33:35 PM|rosetta@home|Aborting result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__239_1890_0: exceeded CPU time limit 99000.250105 1/27/2006 2:33:35 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__239_1890_0 (Maximum CPU time exceeded) 1/27/2006 2:33:38 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 1/27/2006 2:33:38 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1aiu__239_1890_0 finished 1/27/2006 2:34:37 PM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 1/27/2006 2:34:37 PM|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work 1/27/2006 2:34:37 PM|rosetta@home|Requesting 8640 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 results 1/27/2006 2:34:42 PM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded 1/27/2006 2:34:44 PM|rosetta@home|Started download of 1mkyA.psipred_ss2.gz Some of the message related to pausing and restarting deleted for brevity |
KwintenB Send message Joined: 24 Nov 05 Posts: 6 Credit: 183,329 RAC: 0 |
I already posted on the message board, but now i see it has al special place for max cpu time Post this before the intervention of the moderator. My job was 100% completed, and yes i'm sure it was a Maximum CPU Time Exceeded. Hope we'll get credits for these jobs. Thank you in advance |
Koen Send message Joined: 29 Sep 05 Posts: 8 Credit: 8,542,574 RAC: 0 |
|
XS_Duc Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 310,471 RAC: 0 |
|
scsimodo Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 93 Credit: 946,359 RAC: 0 |
Next one for me: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=7329736 percent completed: somewhere around 90% (guessed) Please shorten the WUs, I already crunchend nearly 50 Hours for nothing, thats about 600 Credits!! |
KwintenB Send message Joined: 24 Nov 05 Posts: 6 Credit: 183,329 RAC: 0 |
Got another one with the CPU Time Exceeded WU error PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1fkb__250_348_1 The remarkable thing is, that the wu crunched as long as last one reported with a CPU time Excession. Togheter this is a lost of 425 credits :-( |
XS_Duc Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 310,471 RAC: 0 |
|
Cureseekers~VortoN Send message Joined: 11 Nov 05 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,396,786 RAC: 0 |
One failing WU of another system, more will follow in 10 hours or so. PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_1ten__250_676_0 |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Maximum CPU Time Exceeded WU HERE
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org