Hi hugotheherit

This is one of your results. A win 98 right?

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=15296368

Anders n

Yep, I have three machines running Rosetta@Home and my smoothwall router/internet sever etc... running seti cause it's a bit small for anything else :)

P4 3.0 Ghz, 1GB Ram Win XP Home SP2 (running Rosetta and Ralph, Ralphs out of work at the moment)
P4 1.0 Ghz, 256 Ram Win 98se (running Rosetta)
P3 933Mhz, 256 Ram Win 98se (running Rosetta)
P3 500Mhz, 128 Ram GNU/Linux (running smoothwall and seti@home)

Edit: GNU linux not Redhat :oops

---

3/04/2006 11:38:45 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HB_BARCODE_30_4ubpA_351_49332_0 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d))

resultid=15780509

---

Please check out the the thread:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1323

There seems to be a new kind of problem that has popped up the past few days on older Win98* machines where the the workunits are not reporting the cpu time back to the core client.

I know these older machines do not meet the minimum specs of the project, but at least mine and those of another person who report the same problem have been working fine up to now.

Just wanted to make sure this was brought to the attention of the project leaders.

Charlie

---

-Charlie

win 98 machines running 4.83 now completes WU's with 0 time and no errors roports as sucess but no credit as cpu time shows zero. but they do go so far through and the time & work done does increment but seems to suddenly say 100% and report.

I have 2 of these machines too old and not enough memory to run XP, this may be related to 4.83 as it seems to be a recent problem.

Machine names

dick.workgroup
piii-1g.WorkGroup

Regards

Rich

---

The first time I saw the 0 time problem on Win 98 was with
Rosetta 4.82 Windows.

Anders n

---

Please check out the the thread:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1323

There seems to be a new kind of problem that has popped up the past few days on older Win98* machines where the the workunits are not reporting the cpu time back to the core client.

I know these older machines do not meet the minimum specs of the project, but at least mine and those of another person who report the same problem have been working fine up to now.

Just wanted to make sure this was brought to the attention of the project leaders.

Charlie

Thanks. I asked Rom about this today, and he said that boinc had a special fix to deal with win98 lack of a timer function, and that his fix to the "leave in memory" problem might have messed up the boinc time keeper. he is looking into fixing it, but in the mean time all the results win98 computers are producing are getting properly collected and are helping us, and we will award credit for all of these jobs, so please bear with the problem for a bit longer.

---

I have had this a three times on this machine since I started Rosetta 3/31. I get WIndowes XP dialog box that athe application errored. This is what is in the event log:

Faulting application rosetta_4.83_windows_intelx86.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module rosetta_4.83_windows_intelx86.exe, version 0.0.0.0, fault address 0x004da3d4.

This has happened a few times on this machine. A P4 3ghz with WIndows XP Pro. It has also occurred on my AMD64 X2, but I do not know if the evnt log says the same thing.

---

This WU https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=16041300

was aborted sins it did not count up the steps and did not regester the energi changes.

Anders n

---

This WU https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=16041300

was aborted sins it did not count up the steps and did not regester the energi changes.

Anders n

I just got one of these workunits and saw no energies or steps are being registered. How will this affect the workunit and what is returned to the server?

---

not a processing error, but a download error, details in the problem downloading a WU - HTTP 416 thread

---

Want to search the BOINC Wiki, BOINCstats, or various BOINC forums from within firefox? Try the BOINC related Firefox Search Plugins

8/04/2006 1:44:51 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1hz6_420_4766_0 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d))
resultid=16362541
according to the boinc manager, it was at 33.64% after 5h26min of cpu time.

note, i had the same error 5 days ago (from below on this thread):

Message 12979 - Posted 3 Apr 2006 13:48:31 UTC

3/04/2006 11:38:45 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HB_BARCODE_30_4ubpA_351_49332_0 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d))

resultid=15780509

my system is a dual p3 933, 768 mb ram, winxp sp2.

---

another HB workunit error:
8/04/2006 4:34:36 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_425_8951_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=16550140

i think i'll give up reporting any more of these HB errors for the time being (i've reported about 5, on both ralph and rosetta, over the past few hours).

---

another HB workunit error:
8/04/2006 4:34:36 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_425_8951_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=16550140

i think i'll give up reporting any more of these HB errors for the time being (i've reported about 5, on both ralph and rosetta, over the past few hours).

Dunno if it's significant or not. I just had a machine error out an HLBR WU. What's interesting is that I've had a number of them run just fine in the last few days, all with the 4.83 client. This is the first one that failed, but it's also the first WU I've done with the new 4.97 client. This is in no way a statistically significant sample. Not yet. I'll keep an eye on this, since the same system is now merrily crunching away on another HLBR 4.97 WU.

---

same here
8-4-2006 12:39:49|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_426_2393_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))

got 8 off those exits now.

all with 4.97

Ben

---

same here
8-4-2006 12:39:49|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1ogw_426_2393_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))

got 8 off those exits now.

all with 4.97

Ben

Same here...I'm new to Rosetta@home (just started on the 5th) but I've had no problems until the switch to 4.97. I haven't had a successful WU since then.

Ray

Computer 190981

All WUs on 8th April ended with memory errors - this is my Crucial Ballistix 2GB memory kit starting to die, I'm afraid. Now offline for testing.

Since the upgrade to version 4.97, I've had most of the WU's failing with client errors on my 4 windoze boxes (42 failures & counting!). My linux box is OK. FYI, I had absolutely no errors with 4.83 since it was released. These are the errors I'm seeing:

***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00599FF4 read attempt to address 0x06C2FFF0
***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00599FF4 read attempt to address 0x06C2FC8C
***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x007022EA read attempt to address 0x06AAFF34
***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00599FF4 read attempt to address 0x06CBFA98
***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x007022EA read attempt to address 0x0EB4FF90

---

I am new here and using version 4.97. I too have almost all my WU's failing with similar codes. ***unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_2reb_426_1061_0 (-exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))***

I've had 5 wu's crash all running 4.97, some from each of my two machines, (one machine is Intel P-IV 2.533GHz Northwood running NT4, the other an Intel P-IV 3.2GHz Prescott running XP neither OC'd). All but one crashed with the same error diagnostic...

<core_client_version>5.2.6</core_client_version>
<message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 1055990
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400

***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00599FF4 read attempt to address 0x0A51FFD8

LoadLibrary( "dbghelp.dll" ): GetLastError = 126

Dump of the Worker(offending) thread:
1: 04/08/06 13:03:07
1: SymGetLineFromAddr(): GetLastError = 126


Dump of the Timer thread:
2: 04/08/06 13:03:07


Dump of the Graphics thread:
3: 04/08/06 13:03:07


Exiting...

</stderr_txt>

... three of them crashed after a little over 300 seconds, the other at a little over 600 seconds.

16611251
16600930
16590438
16520360

The other had run for 5,668 seconds and gave this diagnostic...

<core_client_version>5.2.6</core_client_version>
<message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 1387795
# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200

***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x007022EA read attempt to address 0x0A69FD64

LoadLibrary( "dbghelp.dll" ): GetLastError = 126

Dump of the Worker(offending) thread:
1: 04/08/06 11:33:10


Dump of the Timer thread:
2: 04/08/06 11:33:11


Dump of the Graphics thread:
3: 04/08/06 11:33:11


Exiting...

</stderr_txt>

During the same period, I have had 2 wu's complete normally.

The error, (126), is a "module not found" error.

---

Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.

I am new here and using version 4.97. I too have almost all my WU's failing with similar codes. ***unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_2reb_426_1061_0 (-exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))***

I'm really sorry about these problems. I checked yesterday on RALPH and everything seemed fine, but there clearly is a problem. Unfortunately, I'm just leaving for a family weekend trip so can't figure things out right away. Please bear with us for a couple of days.

---