Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors

Author	Message
Shoikan Send message Joined: 4 Apr 06 Posts: 14 Credit: 180,211 RAC: 0	Message 14032 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 12:33:53 UTC Last modified: 18 Apr 2006, 12:34:35 UTC ID: 14032 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

TychoNJ Send message Joined: 29 Mar 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 17,174 RAC: 0	Message 14038 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 14:06:24 UTC First time Rosetta poster. One of my PCs hasn't finished a Rosetta WU in over a week. Every WU fails: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=192132 It's an Athlon XP 1700 running Windows XP SP2. It's a bit low on RAM (256) but it ran Rosetta fine for several weeks before this started happening. I have two other PCs running Rosetta, an Athlon64 (1GB RAM) with minimal failures, and a Celeron-D (512MB RAM) with almost zero failures. Is my Athlon XP just getting troublesome work units or is it the PC? Should I just detach that one? ID: 14038 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Divide Overflow Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 82 Credit: 921,382 RAC: 0	Message 14093 - Posted: 19 Apr 2006, 7:14:24 UTC I just had one of these Maximum CPU time exceeded WU's on my Linux box: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=17037408 That's a lot of wasted CPU time. :( ID: 14093 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Mikkie Send message Joined: 1 Apr 06 Posts: 9 Credit: 5,700 RAC: 0	Message 14095 - Posted: 19 Apr 2006, 8:05:56 UTC Last modified: 19 Apr 2006, 8:13:38 UTC Ladies and Gentleman, for the good cause [helping cancer research] I teamed up for rosetta on 2006-04-01 but now, after 3 weeks its time to say goodbye. The last error did the trick. 2006-04-18 22:15:59 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result VP_PRODUCTION_core_vp26__442_161_0 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)) https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=173357 For this moment its too much a waste of time. I'll be back if the Boinc/Rosetta combination is a stable one. ID: 14095 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0	Message 14103 - Posted: 19 Apr 2006, 12:01:41 UTC - in response to Message 14038. First time Rosetta poster. One of my PCs hasn't finished a Rosetta WU in over a week. Every WU fails: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=192132 It's an Athlon XP 1700 running Windows XP SP2. It's a bit low on RAM (256) but it ran Rosetta fine for several weeks before this started happening. I have two other PCs running Rosetta, an Athlon64 (1GB RAM) with minimal failures, and a Celeron-D (512MB RAM) with almost zero failures. Is my Athlon XP just getting troublesome work units or is it the PC? Should I just detach that one? Attach it to RALPH and see if the problem goes away. If not they will be able to use the information to diagnose the problem. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact ID: 14103 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Dimitris Hatzopoulos Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 336 Credit: 80,939 RAC: 0	Message 14151 - Posted: 20 Apr 2006, 0:39:15 UTC Not a bug, but you should compress (.gz) the various .alltopologycodes.bar files, if possible. The one I see right now in front of me 1tul__alltopologycodes.bar is 4.3MBytes uncompressed, compressible to 25 KBYTES with RAR ! Best UFO Resources Wikipedia R@h How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity ID: 14151 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0	Message 14152 - Posted: 20 Apr 2006, 1:22:29 UTC - in response to Message 14151. Dimitri, thanks for pointing this out! A silly oversight on our part. Not a bug, but you should compress (.gz) the various .alltopologycodes.bar files, if possible. The one I see right now in front of me 1tul__alltopologycodes.bar is 4.3MBytes uncompressed, compressible to 25 KBYTES with RAR ! ID: 14152 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Dimitris Hatzopoulos Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 336 Credit: 80,939 RAC: 0	Message 14279 - Posted: 21 Apr 2006, 17:05:54 UTC - in response to Message 14152. Last modified: 21 Apr 2006, 17:08:17 UTC Not a bug, but you should compress (.gz) the various .alltopologycodes.bar files, if possible. The one I see right now in front of me 1tul__alltopologycodes.bar is 4.3MBytes uncompressed, compressible to 25 KBYTES with RAR ! Just a quick reminder that it still seems to be an issue (personally, I don't mind, but for folks with dialup...): $ ll ~boinc/BOINC/projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/ total 27384 [b]-rw-r--r-- 1 boinc boinc 4422600 2006-04-21 08:00 1tul__alltopologycodes.bar[/b] -rw-r--r-- 1 boinc boinc 630 2006-04-21 08:00 1tul_.bar -rw-r--r-- 1 boinc boinc 58176 2006-04-21 07:57 1tul_EnergyCorrection.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 boinc boinc 123 2006-04-21 08:01 1tul_.fasta.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 boinc boinc 16858 2006-04-21 08:00 1tul.pdb.gz Best UFO Resources Wikipedia R@h How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity ID: 14279 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

R/B Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 195 Credit: 28,095 RAC: 0	Message 14526 - Posted: 24 Apr 2006, 8:09:16 UTC computer ID 92884 4 Apr 2006 12:25:21 UTC name DOUBLE_SS_WEIGHT_1cei__419_179 Result id wu id 16115749 13176948 This is an apparent ghost unit? This particular machine has been running almost 24/7 and never times out. Don't know if this is important or not but thought I'd put it here anyway. Founder of BOINC GROUP - Objectivists - Philosophically minded rational data crunchers. ID: 14526 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors - II