These CPU's where purchased for the CASP 7 push. Hats off to you NJKID.

For sure! Thanks!

---

Team Starfire World BOINC

I think I found one:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=270793

Wow, it has a float benchmark of 8769.12 and an int of 32912.92 .

My old Duron running at stock has a float of 927.73 and an int of 1620.25 with the standard Linux client.

But that Duron seems to be crunching about half as many models per cpu-hour as the Kentfield does.

Some people are really going to be in for a shock when the Rosetta project starts awarding credit based on actual work done.

if you'll notice, in your rosetta settings, the WU's run for a certain amount of time before uploading. its a little option called "target CPU runtime". so, if you had your target CPU runtime for 2 hours, and he had the kentsfield on 4, it would look like you are completing half the WU's his kentsfield is completing. but in reality, your duron might be doing about 25% what 1 core of his kentsfield is doing, if even that much.

ex2cib
XS_The_Machine

---

I think I found one:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=270793

Wow, it has a float benchmark of 8769.12 and an int of 32912.92 .

My old Duron running at stock has a float of 927.73 and an int of 1620.25 with the standard Linux client.

But that Duron seems to be crunching about half as many models per cpu-hour as the Kentfield does.

Some people are really going to be in for a shock when the Rosetta project starts awarding credit based on actual work done.

if you'll notice, in your rosetta settings, the WU's run for a certain amount of time before uploading. its a little option called "target CPU runtime". so, if you had your target CPU runtime for 2 hours, and he had the kentsfield on 4, it would look like you are completing half the WU's his kentsfield is completing. but in reality, your duron might be doing about 25% what 1 core of his kentsfield is doing, if even that much.

ex2cib
XS_The_Machine

I corrected for the difference in run time. That is why I said "per cpu-hour".

Just curious, I can't find any in the credits section. Not sure if they would show up as something other than a Xeon 3.0 GHz.

Found one.

(grin)

5.4.11

Just curious, I can't find any in the credits section. Not sure if they would show up as something other than a Xeon 3.0 GHz.

Found one.

(grin)

5.4.11

Bring that puppy over to the XS site and post some benches with it.
I assume your using one of the Supermicro X7xxx MB's with it?
And just to entice you, there's just been a clovertown system tested there.
Yes, like a dual Kentsfield..8 cores and you should see the numbers it can do!
Thanks for your time,
Movieman

---