Since There is not going to be any back dating of credit then we should at least do this :

1) Declair that XS won the race under the current credit system
2) Start the race over again from zero using the new credit system

Then we will really be able to see who is accomplishing what.

---

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1GHz Boinc v5.8.8

And God said"Let there be light."But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer.

Then we will really be able to see who is accomplishing what.

Once the new system is in place, the RAC should be a great way to compare user/team current output.

---

Then we will really be able to see who is accomplishing what.

Once the new system is in place, the RAC should be a great way to compare user/team current output.

I concur.

However, the "top participants" by total credit will forever remain skewed.

Ethan: I want to know why my post was just pulled?
There was nothing in it at all that called for this action!
Movieman

---

Ethan: I want to know why my post was just pulled?
There was nothing in it at all that called for this action!
Movieman

Obviously I disagree. Feel free to contact me via the moderator email.

---

Ethan: I want to know why my post was just pulled?
There was nothing in it at all that called for this action!
Movieman

Obviously I disagree. Feel free to contact me via the moderator email.

I don't see the need. You've overstepped your authority and by this action you show your bias. You keep hammering nails into a coffin for rosetta. BY the time your done there will be nothing left.
Movieman

---

Since There is not going to be any back dating of credit then we should at least do this :

1) Declair that XS won the race under the current credit system
2) Start the race over again from zero using the new credit system

Then we will really be able to see who is accomplishing what.

It is all about XS.
Again It is all about petty jealousy. At least you are honest and you dont hide under other pretenses.
The issue here has been how to get at XS. First hidding behind slanders and then hidding behind calls for fairness that in themselves were not fair.

But at the end the issue has been the jealousy. It is very clear now.

Ethan: I want to know why my post was just pulled?
There was nothing in it at all that called for this action!
Movieman

Obviously I disagree. Feel free to contact me via the moderator email.

Ethan if what you removed was a defense of XS and you left the atttack at XS and worst the restart of a back dating thread dont complaint when you generate anger. The first post is an attack on XS and a backdating thread in the making. Yet you left it alone.

Dont comlaint then when you are accused of anti XS bias.

I'm actually about even on being called biased by both sides. I offered to discuss it offline, and that offer still stands.

The credits aren't going to be zero'ed out. Although somoeone could capture the export file before the new WU system goes live and keep track of it themselves.

---

Since There is not going to be any back dating of credit then we should at least do this :

1) Declair that XS won the race under the current credit system
2) Start the race over again from zero using the new credit system

Then we will really be able to see who is accomplishing what.

This a clear flame bait and an attack on my team.

Ethan the fact that you have allowed it to stand as is, is clear proof of your anti XS Bias.

Dont complain then when fights start. You are an accomplice to the flamers.

I'm actually about even on being called bias by both sides. I offered to discuss it offline, and that offer still stands.

The credits aren't going to be zero'ed out. Although somoeone could capture the export file before the new WU system goes live and keep track of it themselves.

Actually there is nothing to discuss with you. That original Post is flamer material no if or buts and you allowed it to stand .

This is the 4 or 5th thread on backdating and attacks on XS that has been opened since the NO BACKDATING Dictum that you have allowed to be open and to stand.

No eveness there.

I'm actually about even on being called bias by both sides. I offered to discuss it offline, and that offer still stands.

The credits aren't going to be zero'ed out. Although somoeone could capture the export file before the new WU system goes live and keep track of it themselves.

Ethan: To discuss it offline is to hide it from the publics eye. I have nothing to hide. What I suggested was a simple bring it and back up your mouth with your equipment..Nothing more, nothing less..
The loser walks away.
No insults, no flaming..a simple contest..
What in gods name could you possibly object to on that?
Movieman

---

Ethan: To discuss it offline is to hide it from the publics eye. I have nothing to hide. What I suggested was a simple bring it and back up your mouth with your equipment..Nothing more, nothing less..
The loser walks away.
No insults, no flaming..a simple contest..
What in gods name could you possibly object to on that?
Movieman

When you start a message "Not as a flame but to make a point" it's tinder.

When you pick out specific members who have a different opinion than yours, and essentially challenge them to a knife fight, it's tinder.

Both sides of this have set perceptions of the other, in my opinion, your post was going to lead to another flame thread.

---

Ethan: To discuss it offline is to hide it from the publics eye. I have nothing to hide. What I suggested was a simple bring it and back up your mouth with your equipment..Nothing more, nothing less..
The loser walks away.
No insults, no flaming..a simple contest..
What in gods name could you possibly object to on that?
Movieman

When you start a message "Not as a flame but to make a point" it's tinder.

When you pick out specific members who have a different opinion than yours, and essentially challenge them to a knife fight, it's tinder.

Both sides of this have set perceptions of the other, in my opinion, your post was going to lead to another flame thread.

Ok, then I will edit my proposal so that it meets your criteria.
Movieman

---

I'm actually about even on being called bias by both sides. I offered to discuss it offline, and that offer still stands.

The credits aren't going to be zero'ed out. Although somoeone could capture the export file before the new WU system goes live and keep track of it themselves.

Ethan: To discuss it offline is to hide it from the publics eye. I have nothing to hide. What I suggested was a simple bring it and back up your mouth with your equipment..Nothing more, nothing less..
The loser walks away.
No insults, no flaming..a simple contest..
What in gods name could you possibly object to on that?
Movieman

Well Dave he is protecting the ones he has allowed to open thread , after thread on backdating after the project bosses said the backdating issue was closed and he is making a lier of David Bakers claim that our crunching efforrts are valued by allowing attack, thread after attack thread against XS opened and then censor us when we defend ourselves from the baseless attacks and the inuendoes.

Please post it as a new thread, and I might suggest a different result for the loser. . buying the others cookies perhaps.

---

You know Ethan, you have a funny way of moderating a forum.. Next time you delete a post by a member of my team, be a man about it.

Youre new credit system sucks. With its implementation, youre just hurting rosetta..

XS did more than just won under the old credit system. We kicked major ass. If we wanted to, we would do it under the new one as well.

mmciastro.. when youre removed from these forums, i will resume my crumching for rosetta.

Haltech
XtremeSystems

---

SETI...Grown Men Looking For ET's That Dont Exist... Do You Dress Up Like Starwars Characters Too?

Please delete, new thread will be started

---

Ethan: To discuss it offline is to hide it from the publics eye. I have nothing to hide. What I suggested was a simple bring it and back up your mouth with your equipment..Nothing more, nothing less..
The loser walks away.
No insults, no flaming..a simple contest..
What in gods name could you possibly object to on that?
Movieman

When you start a message "Not as a flame but to make a point" it's tinder.

When you pick out specific members who have a different opinion than yours, and essentially challenge them to a knife fight, it's tinder.

Both sides of this have set perceptions of the other, in my opinion, your post was going to lead to another flame thread.

'

Ethan read the first post. That is an open attack on my team insinuating again the baseless libel that we have been not using the proper methods to be number one. It is another thread on backdating.

YOU and only you have allowed that to stand.
And then complain we are angry.

Read your titles:

Forum moderator
Project administrator
Project developer

if you were anyone else you could be ignored. But your bias are the bias of Forum moderator
Project administrator
Project developer

That cannot be ignored.

And with that. . let's call this thread closed. The credits aren't going to be zero'd out, but users can keep thrack of this via the export file before and after the new wu system is turned on if they so wish.

Movieman, please copy your message to a new thread.

---