RE: Rosetta@home hardware/fireware failure - Sept. 8/07

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : RE: Rosetta@home hardware/fireware failure - Sept. 8/07

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 05
Posts: 238
Credit: 314,893
RAC: 0
Message 45787 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 7:33:14 UTC

R@H is not working correctly as yet here

Error on file upload: can't open log file
etc...

I imagine that KEL went home for some much needed rest, but hopefully somebody is still there that can fix it.

You may also want to increase the deadline for WU's (that you accept as valid).
ID: 45787 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5691
Credit: 5,859,226
RAC: 0
Message 45794 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 8:54:38 UTC - in response to Message 45787.  

i'm seing the same thing
R@H is not working correctly as yet here

Error on file upload: can't open log file
etc...

I imagine that KEL went home for some much needed rest, but hopefully somebody is still there that can fix it.

You may also want to increase the deadline for WU's (that you accept as valid).


ID: 45794 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Buzz

Send message
Joined: 9 Sep 07
Posts: 1
Credit: 167,044
RAC: 0
Message 45819 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 13:46:29 UTC - in response to Message 45794.  

i'm seing the same thing
R@H is not working correctly as yet here

Error on file upload: can't open log file
etc...

I imagine that KEL went home for some much needed rest, but hopefully somebody is still there that can fix it.

You may also want to increase the deadline for WU's (that you accept as valid).


I'm just trying to join the project for the first time, and keep getting a similiar message:

9/9/2007 9:41:25 AM|rosetta@home|Message from server: Server can't open log file (../log_boinc/cgi.log)
ID: 45819 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5691
Credit: 5,859,226
RAC: 0
Message 45820 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 13:50:24 UTC - in response to Message 45819.  

i'm seing the same thing
R@H is not working correctly as yet here

Error on file upload: can't open log file
etc...

I imagine that KEL went home for some much needed rest, but hopefully somebody is still there that can fix it.

You may also want to increase the deadline for WU's (that you accept as valid).


I'm just trying to join the project for the first time, and keep getting a similiar message:

9/9/2007 9:41:25 AM|rosetta@home|Message from server: Server can't open log file (../log_boinc/cgi.log)


the system is still offline when it comes to transfering files.
maybe monday morning or late sunday night they will have it running again.

ID: 45820 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
John Koulouris,(Esq.)

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 06
Posts: 1
Credit: 5,733
RAC: 0
Message 45822 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 14:07:00 UTC
Last modified: 9 Sep 2007, 14:08:35 UTC

It is truly unfortunate to have such an event occur to the Rosetta@Home project. I, and the Rosetta@Home global user community are very proud to be a part of this project from the beginning, and we will be here to assist this project for as long as it is running.

We would like to give a piece of our mind to the vendor of the hardware though... but I think David and the Rosetta@Home team will do a good job giving our piece of mind to them anyway.

David, let us know when everything is up and running.
The Rosetta world community is here to back you up 100%.

Regards,

John Koulouris,(Esq.)
ID: 45822 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Keith E. Laidig
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 154
Credit: 117,189,961
RAC: 0
Message 45827 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 14:54:14 UTC - in response to Message 45822.  

It is truly unfortunate to have such an event occur to the Rosetta@Home project. I, and the Rosetta@Home global user community are very proud to be a part of this project from the beginning, and we will be here to assist this project for as long as it is running.

We would like to give a piece of our mind to the vendor of the hardware though... but I think David and the Rosetta@Home team will do a good job giving our piece of mind to them anyway.

David, let us know when everything is up and running.
The Rosetta world community is here to back you up 100%.

Regards,

John Koulouris,(Esq.)


I have to admit that it is tempting to give out the email address of the OEM vice presidents to the R@H community to allow the user base to express their opinion directly to those concerned... -KEL

ID: 45827 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5691
Credit: 5,859,226
RAC: 0
Message 45829 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 15:35:56 UTC - in response to Message 45827.  

It is truly unfortunate to have such an event occur to the Rosetta@Home project. I, and the Rosetta@Home global user community are very proud to be a part of this project from the beginning, and we will be here to assist this project for as long as it is running.

We would like to give a piece of our mind to the vendor of the hardware though... but I think David and the Rosetta@Home team will do a good job giving our piece of mind to them anyway.

David, let us know when everything is up and running.
The Rosetta world community is here to back you up 100%.

Regards,

John Koulouris,(Esq.)


I have to admit that it is tempting to give out the email address of the OEM vice presidents to the R@H community to allow the user base to express their opinion directly to those concerned... -KEL


sounds like a lawsuit from the lab to the OEM about terms of service or shipping hardware that is faulty aka has bugs, etc.

though i suppose a little public bad mouthing might do the trick.
ID: 45829 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile scsimodo

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 93
Credit: 946,359
RAC: 0
Message 45876 - Posted: 9 Sep 2007, 21:11:03 UTC - in response to Message 45827.  

I have to admit that it is tempting to give out the email address of the OEM vice presidents to the R@H community ...

Hehe, would be funny!
But I think it's already enough for them, if you address you complaint on behalf of more than 150.000 participants. This is the worst advertising I can imagine, if I were VP of this company. :)
ID: 45876 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
David Baker
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 705
Credit: 559,847
RAC: 0
Message 45893 - Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 4:00:08 UTC - in response to Message 45876.  

I have to admit that it is tempting to give out the email address of the OEM vice presidents to the R@H community ...

Hehe, would be funny!
But I think it's already enough for them, if you address you complaint on behalf of more than 150.000 participants. This is the worst advertising I can imagine, if I were VP of this company. :)


yes--maybe we can file a complaint with 150,000 names listed... I might try to contact them early this week...
ID: 45893 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5691
Credit: 5,859,226
RAC: 0
Message 45901 - Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 5:44:03 UTC - in response to Message 45893.  

I have to admit that it is tempting to give out the email address of the OEM vice presidents to the R@H community ...

Hehe, would be funny!
But I think it's already enough for them, if you address you complaint on behalf of more than 150.000 participants. This is the worst advertising I can imagine, if I were VP of this company. :)


yes--maybe we can file a complaint with 150,000 names listed... I might try to contact them early this week...


take a ad out in the times and the p-i and one of the computer trade journals that they advertise in and give them grief there.
ID: 45901 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
The_Bad_Penguin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jun 06
Posts: 2751
Credit: 4,271,025
RAC: 0
Message 45923 - Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 12:37:18 UTC - in response to Message 45893.  
Last modified: 10 Sep 2007, 13:31:02 UTC

"Complaint" my @$$, if Housing and Food Services is anywhere in the ballpark with their estimate !!!

I'd hit them with an "bill" for $1m !!!

While I'm certain the OEM has all sorts of contractual clauses disclaiming various types of liability...

the fact that Rosie can quantify her loss, apparently as a direct result of the OEM's negligence, I would think that Rosetta's future SHOULD be including some VERY NICE free upgrades...

Hate to say it, but if the OEM is not in a "goodwill" sort of mood, then it may be worth bringing in the lawyers...

Hardware failure is one thing, negligent product design is something completely different...

(to wit: "The newest edition of our SAN hardware was shipped with a firmware revision that contained an insidious bug - one which caused the new SAN disks to vanish after roughly 45 days of service. ")

I'm certain that beyond myself, out of the 150,000, there are additional law school grads who would be more than happy to write a letter on Rosie's behalf...

yes--maybe we can file a complaint with 150,000 names listed... I might try to contact them early this week...

ID: 45923 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5691
Credit: 5,859,226
RAC: 0
Message 45931 - Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 13:46:41 UTC - in response to Message 45923.  

heck, this would make a good case study and project for the UW law school students.

"Complaint" my @$$, if Housing and Food Services is anywhere in the ballpark with their estimate !!!

I'd hit them with an "bill" for $1m !!!

While I'm certain the OEM has all sorts of contractual clauses disclaiming various types of liability...

the fact that Rosie can quantify her loss, apparently as a direct result of the OEM's negligence, I would think that Rosetta's future SHOULD be including some VERY NICE free upgrades...

Hate to say it, but if the OEM is not in a "goodwill" sort of mood, then it may be worth bringing in the lawyers...

Hardware failure is one thing, negligent product design is something completely different...

(to wit: "The newest edition of our SAN hardware was shipped with a firmware revision that contained an insidious bug - one which caused the new SAN disks to vanish after roughly 45 days of service. ")

I'm certain that beyond myself, out of the 150,000, there are additional law school grads who would be more than happy to write a letter on Rosie's behalf...

yes--maybe we can file a complaint with 150,000 names listed... I might try to contact them early this week...



ID: 45931 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Luuklag

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 07
Posts: 262
Credit: 4,171
RAC: 0
Message 46694 - Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 18:57:17 UTC

well and if u file a lawsuite, you should call the press, cause their most likely to take this for a story in the papers etc. and thats FREE PUBLICITIE . Yeeeey ;)
ID: 46694 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : RE: Rosetta@home hardware/fireware failure - Sept. 8/07



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org